Inoculating the grain bags was another good review of aseptic techniques. Furthermore, since I had only inoculated grain bags with Courtney before, it was a good experience to be doing it with Sarah. I was able to see more ways of handling contamination. This is good for me because it allows me to pick and choose methods that work best for me.
Over break, I am to finish the conclusion for the light vs. dark experiment. The average of the total wet weight (the weight from the first flush added to the second flush) was greater for the light set than the dark set, not as we had predicted. For both sets, the second flush yielded smaller oysters. I don't believe much error came from contamination, as only three blocks were contaminated and two of those were from the light set.
Adina, I appreciate how you are going with the flow, which is an important scientific skill. I trust that you will find a way to use the proper fungal species.
ReplyDeleteI like your clear review of your experimental activities. It give a full sense of what you are working on, and leaves me eager for your next blog post!
This is so interesting, Adina. When results do not match expectation, it gives researchers a great opportunity both to examine possible errors more closely and to rethink any assumptions they may have made in their initial hypothesis. This is exactly why scientists need to test every aspect of their thinking!
ReplyDelete